Order

—

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#Deutsche Transnational Trustee Corporation, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GUSTO – Earlier EU word mark GUSTONI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-234/25.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#EO v European Parliament.#Civil Service – Members of the temporary staff – Publication of a press release by a political group of the Parliament – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Liability – Material and non-material harm – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-374/25.

—

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 April 2026.#European Institute for Innovation through Health Data v Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking.#Interim relief – Research and technological development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Grant agreements – Final audit report – Application for interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-85/26 R.

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.

—

—

—

—

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 April 2026.#Green Asset, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark hômity – Earlier EU figurative mark DOMITYS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-683/24.

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 April 2026.#Access Info Europe v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the revision of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Initial refusal of access – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-507/25.

Order of the President of the General Court of 30 March 2026.#Ecolog Deutschland GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-31/26 R.

—

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#MS and Others v Council of the European Union.#Case T-653/25 R.

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#Stanislav Dobrinov Stoyanov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-654/25 R.

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Molkerei Gropper GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-372/25.

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Molkerei Gropper GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-387/25.

—

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#WS v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Action for annulment and damages – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Complaint to the EDPS concerning the processing of personal data by EUIPO – No need to adjudicate in part – Manifest inadmissibility in part.#Case T-144/25.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Case C-593/25.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Assessorato regionale della Salute.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana.#Case C-181/25.

Order of the Court of 24 March 2026.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-766/25 P.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#D. D. and B. Zh. v „Financial Bulgaria“ EOOD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-426/23.

—

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-428/21.

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-427/21.

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 March 2026.#Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank AG v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against Iran – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Application for suspension of operation – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-865/25 R.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ministero dell'Interno and Questura Ragusa v TV en tant que représentant légal de 23 PLAY srls.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana.#Case C-589/25.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 March 2026.#OW v VQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-647/25.

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Grzegorz Mordalski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-251/25.

—

—

—

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 March 2026.#Dragoș Ionuț Onescu v European Commission.#Case C-642/25 P.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FL v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-564/25 P.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#CW v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-565/25 P.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Article 340 TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-contractual liability of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data transmitted to Europol by national authorities – Reality of the damage allegedly suffered – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-566/25 P.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Consumer Rights Recovery sp. z o.o., anciennement Helpfind Recovery sp. z o.o. v Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Case C-566/24.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#BF v ZAD „Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Case C-561/25.

Order of the Court of 4 March 2026.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency of development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-719/25 P.

—

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026.#XV v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr.#Case C-526/25.

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2026.#IW v European Commission and European Medicines Agency.#Case T-265/25.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#PRVO PLINARSKO DRUŠTVO d.o.o. v Gazprom export LLC and Privredna banka Zagreb d.d.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske.#Case C-403/24.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 February 2026.#Christofer Edge v European Investment Bank.#Action for annulment – Civil service – EIB staff – Period within which proceedings must be commenced – Article 41a of the Staff Regulations of the EIB – Calculation of time limits – Not admissible.#Case T-267/24.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Bytové družstvo so sídlom v Trnave v Prima banka Slovensko, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave.#Case C-168/25.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#A. A. v C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Case C-368/25.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#RY v European Commission.#Case C-336/25 P.

—

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Fédération européenne d'associations et d'industries pharmaceutiques (EFPIA) v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-158/25.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Cosmetics Europe - The Personal Care Association v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 9 and 10 of, and Annex III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-169/25.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Accord Healthcare France SAS and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annexes I and III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-156/25, T-157/25, T-159/25 to T-168/25, T-170/25 and T-171/25.

—

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#MB v Societatea Națională [U].#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Case C-861/24.

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Miguel Ángel Navarro Fernández v European Parliament.#Action for failure to act – Application for an order – Application for interim measures – Applicant not represented – Failure to put in order – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-404/25.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-212/25.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-213/25.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-210/25.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-211/25.

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-135/21.

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.

—

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2026.#Leidos, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-260/25.

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 February 2026.#jundado GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-447/25.

—

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission.#Case T-653/22 REC.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2026.#Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. - Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-316/25.

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-620/25 P.

Order of the Court of 3 February 2026.#Guangzhou Wanglaoji Grand Health Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-619/25 P.

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#Nokia Oyj v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Rectification.#Case T-617/24 REC.

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#LM v European Commission.#Case T-261/25.

—

—

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#OMV Petrom Marketing v Compania Naţională de Administrare a Infrastructurii Rutiere SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Answer admitting of no reasonable doubt – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Trans-European transport network – Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 – Road transport infrastructure – Article 19(d) – Parking areas – Article 39(2)(c) – Rest areas – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 8a – Information about safe and secure parking areas – National legislation prohibiting the construction of motorway service areas, including secure parking areas, on private land – Article 56 TFEU – Inapplicability – Purely internal situation.#Case C-439/25.

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2026.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Case T-201/25.

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 26 January 2026.#Société d'exploitation des ports du Détroit v European Commission.#Case C-742/25 P(I).

—

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2026.#EXOIL Paliwa sp. z o.o. v Republic of Poland.#Case C-436/25 P.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Giftrans SRL and Florin Giurgiuman v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Administrative investigation conducted by OLAF to support or complement the EPPO’s activity – Article 101(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – OLAF Final Report – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-200/25.

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#UF v European Commission.#Case T-414/25.

—

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 January 2026.#Cirsa Italia SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Case C-437/24.

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2025.#Renate Holzeisen v European Commission.#Case T-375/25 R.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Proceedings brought by.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Notariusz w Krapkowicach Justyna Gawlica - Krapkowice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Measures relating to the European Certificate of Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Refusal by a bank to recognise the European Certificate of Succession – Article 71 – Initiation by a notary, of his or her own motion, of the procedure for the withdrawal or modification of the European Certificate of Succession – No exercise of a judicial function – Inadmissibility.#Case C-240/24.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v GLOBUS Handelshof GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken.#Case C-745/24.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RT v Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Case C-293/25.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#„YETTEL BULGARIA“ EAD v FB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-502/25.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-491/24.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista ODV and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa della Regione autonoma Trentino - Alto Adige/Südtirol.#Joined Cases C-28/24 to C-31/24.

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 December 2025.#Lega Anti Vivisezione (LAV) and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa della Regione autonoma Trentino - Alto Adige/Südtirol.#Joined Cases C-24/24 to C-27/24.

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 17 December 2025.#České dráhy, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Markets for the provision of domestic long-distance rail passenger transport services in the Czech Republic and for the provision of international long-distance rail passenger transport services between Austria and the Czech Republic on the Prague-Vienna route – Access to used railway wagons for long-distance passenger transport in those markets – European Commission decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Action for annulment – Co-perpetrator of that infringement – Interest in the result of the case – None.#Case C-545/25 P(I).

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#AF v Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Case C-565/23.

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2025.#MW v Slovak Telekom a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov.#Case C-423/25.